is recognized, for obvious, that the service maintenance and improvement of our town's gardens remain far from acceptable levels. The USM has two full-time gardeners and a third, auxiliary, part-time. Two and a half workers are an entirely inadequate staffing for adequate provision of service, regardless of management problems, according to Councilman undersigned, USM records in virtually every one of the services it provides to the City Council. In the 2007-2012 Strategic Plan designed by USM provides for the increase in the workforce in a worker more. Beyond that date, at least it is known by the undersigned, there has been this increase in staff, it is insufficient and, in my opinion, the management of USM does not, generally, the credibility it deserves the benefit of a public service, given the balance provided by the management relating to all the services currently manages USM to the City Council. So, considering that:
a) The number of staff that provides the service today is insufficient
gardens
b) The increase in staff and their proper management for USM are unsecured areas, under the joint operation services currently provided by USM.
c) Similarly, the balanced and rational cost of service will not be guaranteed if USM assume that its extension,
the House is proposed for adoption, the following
MOTION:
The City of La Union shall, in the 2010 budget, to increase garden maintenance service, choosing to do so by any of the following solutions:
a) The direct recruitment of two workers full time and material necessary for them to provide the service, if it allows the Sanitation Plan as approved relates to staff costs. This option is for favors that the undersigned in view of the control of the service that the City can be made directly through the competent council. The funding is needed can be obtained by the savings from the amortization of staff positions, the savings in special bonuses and channeling of funds from other governments to ensure that the municipalities have sufficient resources to provide services. In this sense, the central government announces EUR 1900 million for operating expenses (Union would correspond to about 700,000 euros) and the CAAC, in our case, some 120,000 euros, half the amount currently allocated to the Plan Works and Services.
b) The recruitment of competent service company under a contract service delivery, preferably carried out by competition, and annual extension for the purpose of inclusion in future budgets. The increase in current expenditure side under this option believe it can more than offset on account of the items that effect both the autonomous region as the central government will be channeled to the municipalities, as described above, so that they do against the provision of public services.
0 comments:
Post a Comment