Earlier in the blog called "The Coalition", rejected and deleted some of my comments and also criticized by the text I wrote in my blog criticizing the group. I was surprised the sermons moralists who claimed to profess moral relativism and postmodern thought weak, which, incidentally, used as tools to defend a series of atrocities as the despotic government of Iran, bullfighting and Fujimori, to name three examples. Hence, I will respond with the comment that, incidentally, was also deleted:
Everyone is free to post on his blog what you want. You feel bad, "x", it seems to me wrong "z". What is "z"? "Z" is to defend through philosophy, which should be used for good and the betterment of the world, immoral, and misrepresenting their noble cause. Acts such as, for example, bullfighting and extermination by the State of persons whose guilt has not been proven. Who of us has the right about what we think is wrong? You say be thought weak, not close to absolute truth, be open to various forms of assessment. In that case, apply your own philosophy right now this particular situation rather than be scrambling for what I wrote. If you do not believe in absolute moral and universal values, to act, as thus, and not make the outraged moral issues.
Gastañeta By Sofia Tudela.
0 comments:
Post a Comment